Thursday, January 20, 2022  
Weather |  Futures Markets |  Quotes |  Headline News |  Charts |  Markets Page |  Portfolio |  Options 
 Contact Us
 Cash Bids
 Phone Numbers
Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
SCOTUS OKs Trump Docs to Jan. 6 Panel  01/20 06:01

   In a rebuff to former President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court is allowing 
the release of presidential documents sought by the congressional committee 
investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a rebuff to former President Donald Trump, the Supreme 
Court is allowing the release of presidential documents sought by the 
congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection.

   The justices on Wednesday rejected a bid by Trump to withhold the documents 
from the committee until the issue is finally resolved by the courts. Trump's 
lawyers had hoped to prolong the court fight and keep the documents on hold.

   Following the high court's action, there is no legal impediment to turning 
over the documents, which are held by the National Archives and Records 
Administration. They include presidential diaries, visitor logs, speech drafts 
and handwritten notes dealing with Jan. 6 from the files of former chief of 
staff Mark Meadows.

   The committee already has begun to receive records Trump wanted kept secret, 
said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., the committee 
chairman and vice chairwoman, respectively.

   "The Supreme Court's action tonight is a victory for the rule of law and 
American democracy," Thompson and Cheney said in a statement pledging to 
"uncover all the facts about the violence of January 6th and its causes."

   White House spokesman Mike Gwin called the ruling "an important step 
forward" for the investigation, "and in ensuring accountability for an 
unprecedented assault on our democracy and the rule of law."

   The House committee agreed to defer its attempt to get some documents, at 
the request of the Biden White House. The current administration was concerned 
that releasing all of the Trump administration documents sought by the 
committee could compromise national security and executive privilege.

   Alone among the justices, Clarence Thomas said he would have granted Trump's 
request to keep the documents on hold.

   Trump's attorneys had asked the high court to reverse rulings by the federal 
appeals court in Washington and block the release of the records even after 
President Joe Biden waived executive privilege over them.

   In an unsigned opinion, the court acknowledged there are "serious and 
substantial concerns" over whether a former president can win a court order to 
prevent disclosure of certain records from his time in office in a situation 
like this one.

   But the court noted that the appeals court determined that Trump's assertion 
of privilege over the documents would fail under any circumstances, "even if he 
were the incumbent."

   It said the issue of a former president's ability to claim executive 
privilege would have to wait for another day.

   The court took issue with the conclusion of the appeals court that 
downplayed a former president's interests, suggesting that the current 
president could in essence ignore his predecessor's claims.

   Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who worked in the White House under President 
George W. Bush, wrote separately to argue that "a former President must be able 
to successfully invoke the Presidential communications privilege for 
communications that occurred during his Presidency, even if the current 
President does not support the privilege claim."

   But Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, did not object to the outcome Wednesday, 
and neither did the other two justices Trump selected, Neil Gorsuch and Amy 
Coney Barrett.

   Before and after the riot, Trump promoted false theories about election 
fraud and suggested the "real insurrection" was on Election Day, when he lost 
to Biden.

   Repeating arguments they made before lower courts, Trump's attorneys had 
urged the justices to step in, arguing that the case concerned all future 
occupants of the White House. Former presidents had "a clear right to protect 
their confidential records from premature dissemination," Trump's lawyers said.

   "Congress cannot engage in meandering fishing expeditions in the hopes of 
embarrassing President Trump or exposing the President's and his staff's 
sensitive and privileged communications 'for the sake of exposure,'" they added.

   But the House committee responded in its high court brief that although the 
facts of the case are "unprecedented," the decision was "not a difficult one."

   There was no explanation for the timing of the court's action. But the 
National Archives told the appeals court and Trump's lawyers that it would turn 
over some documents it asserted were not part of the court case on Wednesday 
absent a new court order.

   Also on Wednesday, the House committee investigating the Capitol 
insurrection issued subpoenas to leaders of an alt-right group who appeared at 
events promoting baseless claims of voter fraud after the 2020 election.

   The committee demanded records and testimony from Nick Fuentes and Patrick 
Casey -- internet personalities who have promoted white supremacist beliefs -- 
regarding what lawmakers say is their promotion of unsupported claims about the 
election and their presence on Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021.

   Since its creation last summer, the committee has interviewed almost 350 
people as it seeks to create a comprehensive record of the attack and the 
events leading up to it.

Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN