Friday, July 1, 2022  
Weather |  Futures Markets |  Quotes |  Headline News |  Charts |  Markets Page |  Portfolio |  Options 
 Contact Us
 Cash Bids
 Phone Numbers
Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
Climate Concerns Grow                  06/30 06:29


   WASHINGTON (AP) -- Amos Hochstein, President Joe Biden's point man for 
global energy problems, says he knows that transitioning away from the 
climate-wrecking pollution of fossil fuels is the only way to go. He advocates 
urgently for renewable energy, for energy-smart thermostats and heat pumps.

   But when it comes to tackling the pressing energy challenges presented by 
Russia's war on Ukraine, Hochstein also can sound like nothing as much as the 
West's oilfield roustabout, taking a giant pipe wrench to the world's 
near-crisis-level energy shortfalls.

   Appearing before a Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee this month on U.S. 
help in Europe's Russian-fueled energy problems, Hochstein spoke 
enthusiastically of prospects for a new floating natural gas terminal in 
Albania, new gas connections elsewhere in the Balkans, bumping up the flow of 
gas from Central Asia and getting gas out of Spain to the rest of Europe.

   "We have to face the reality that today Europe's system is dependent on 
gas," Hochstein told the AP after the hearing. It was a relatively rare public 
account from an envoy whose work normally is behind the scenes. "And I need to 
make sure that people in the winter have heating, and they have electricity."

   Increasingly, however, some climate advocates are expressing concern at what 
they see as an emphasis from the Biden administration on new, U.S.-heavy 
natural gas and infrastructure projects as part of an all-out effort by Europe 
and the U.S. to wrest Europe away from its reliance on Russian oil and gas.

   Climate groups charge that new spending on building pipelines, terminals, 
port facilities and storage threatens to lock in increased reliance on fossil 
fuel for decades to come, while doing little to solve Europe's most immediate 
energy crisis.

   Criticism increased Tuesday, after Biden and other leaders in the Group of 
Seven softened their 2021 climate pledges to move away from public financing of 
new fossil fuel infrastructure, citing Russia's war.

   "Public support for gas infrastructure is not the climate presidency Joe 
Biden promised," Kate DeAngelis, international finance program manager of 
Friends of the Earth, said in a statement in response.

   But as U.S. companies have nearly tripled America's exports of liquified 
natural gas to Europe in the months since Russia invaded Ukraine, Hochstein 
cites his immediate challenge: getting Europeans through the end of the year 
without freezing in their homes.

   The European Union received roughly 40% of its natural gas from Russia 
before the war. Western-led sanctions and Russian cutoffs, as well as Europe's 
major switch to non-Russian suppliers, are depriving Europe of Russian natural 

   Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike welcomed Hochstein's efforts to 
decouple Europe from Russian pipelines, and asked for more. Climate change and 
clean energy are "important challenges," Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New 
Hampshire, chair of the Europe and Regional Security Cooperation panel where 
Hochstein appeared, told the AP. "But I think our No. 1 priority here needs to 
be to defeat Putin and help Ukraine."

   The Biden administration has struggled to ease two problems simultaneously: 
a global energy crunch and a rapidly heating Earth.

   The shortfalls in oil and gas supplies are creating problems for European 
and Asian allies that if left unaddressed could threaten the united economic 
front against Russian President Vladimir Putin. At home, the energy shortfall 
is contributing to high gasoline prices, inflation and discontent that 
threatens Democrats in November's midterm elections and Biden's reelection down 
the road.

   But at the same time, scientists, climate advocates and the Biden 
administration itself say global governments are counting down the time in the 
last few years left to stave off the more devastating scenarios of climate 

   The rate at which the world now burns through oil, natural gas and coal 
gives humans a 50-50 chance of blasting through the hoped-for maximum average 
temperatures targeted in the Paris climate accord within five years, the World 
Meteorological Organization said last month.

   Some climate advocates fear the current energy shortfalls have Biden and 
other world leaders reverting to an oil and gas drill-and-build outlook they'd 
sworn off in the name of climate change, despite Biden's climate efforts 

   Many were dismayed by the joint declaration this week from Biden and other 
leaders in the G-7 club of wealthy democracies that it was once again OK for 
governments to invest in gas infrastructure as a "temporary response."

   A dangerous move, and an unnecessary one, climate advocates said of the 
G-7's climate step back.

   "New funding for fossil fuel exploration and production infrastructure is 
delusional," U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres tweeted after the G-7 
statement. "Fossil fuels are not the answer. Renewable energy is."

   Climate advocates are wary of what they see as Hochstein's support of some 
infrastructure projects in Europe for liquified natural gas.

   Friends of the Earth points to his oil and gas industry ties. Those include 
his serving as a senior vice president for Houston-based LNG exporter Tellurian 
and as an advisory board member for Ukraine's state-owned Naftogaz, before 
resigning in 2020 to protest corruption he outlined in a newspaper column. In 
Hochstein's government position, Biden has entrusted him with top policy 
missions, including working with oil giant Saudi Arabia at a time of frosty 

   Hochstein described the U.S.-backed LNG buildout in Europe as essential to 
blocking Russia from wielding power over Europe's energy and economy.

   "Unfortunately, we don't have the clean infrastructure to replace natural 
gas in the short- or medium-term," Hochstein told the AP. "So that is a tough 
and difficult balance to have. But that is what we're committed to.

   "And I agree with all those who say this only strengthens the absolute need 
to accelerate the energy transition" from oil and gas, he added.

   Energy experts with environmental groups say there are cleaner ways to break 
from Russian gas.

   Moving faster to curb gas flaring and venting by the energy industry, and 
plug natural gas leaks -- both things the Biden administration already has 
pledged to work on -- could get fast results without damaging the climate 
further, said Mark Brownstein, a senior vice president for energy at the 
Environmental Defense Fund.

   Brownstein pointed to an International Energy Agency finding that the fossil 
fuel industry leaked or otherwise wasted more natural gas last year than all 
the gas used across Europe's power sector.

   Natural gas is mostly methane. Methane from agriculture and fossil fuels 
alone drives about a quarter of all climate damage.

   David Kieve, president of the Environmental Defense Fund's advocacy arm, 
said the days have "come and gone" from when natural gas could be considered a 
"bridge fuel." He was director of public engagement at the White House's 
Council on Environmental Quality in Biden's first year.

   "I think there's an understanding that we need to go even much much faster."

Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN